April 9, 2026

3 thoughts on “The potential of Biodegradable Film (biofilm) for climate-resilient rice production 

  1. Dear IRRI,
    Thank you very much for this article.

    However, for direct-seeded upland rice cultivation, biodegradable film alone may not be sufficient. A subsurface seed-attached biodegradable film system is required, as shown below:

    1) Seed film production: Rice seeds are fixed onto a biodegradable film
    https://youtu.be/ypJAvcO8kkQ

    2) Seed film mulching: The seed film is laid on the field, covered with soil, and fertilizer is applied beneath the film
    https://youtu.be/-Bwbqqgww5c

    This system captures moisture evaporating from the soil and utilizes it for rice germination.
    https://www.seedfilm.co.kr/en/bbs/board.php?bo_table=case&wr_id=24

    Rice is not an aquatic plant; it is traditionally grown in flooded fields primarily for weed control. In fact, rice does not require significantly more water than field crops such as wheat or oats. With subsurface film mulching and adequate rainfall, rice can grow well without flood irrigation.

    According to evaluations by the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, rice production using Seed Film Cultivation (SFC) shows clear advantages over conventional irrigated systems:
    * 15–20% higher yields
    * 80% reduction in water use
    * 80% lower methane and COâ‚‚ emissions
    * 60% reduction in herbicide and pesticide use
    https://ifi.caas.cn/xwzx/zhxw/7ab31b8d375244219d38ab8dbe1b4653.htm

    We would welcome the opportunity to discuss the possibility of a pilot project in collaboration with you.

    Respectfully yours,
    Sung-jin CHOE, CEO of Green and Seed Corporation
    sjchoe@seedfilm.co.kr
    https://www.seedfilm.co.kr
    (+82) 10-9227-4976
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/sungjin-choe

  2. In 2025, organic SFC rice yields reached approximately 7 t/ha of paddy, and over 9 t/ha when slow-release fertilizers were used. The biodegradable film, made from PLA and PBAT and priced at $450/ha, proved highly cost-effective when considering the increased yields along with reductions in labor, water use, and methane emissions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.